Whedonistas reading in Brooklyn

WHEDONISTAS AT THE WAYSTATION
Readings from Whedonistas: A Celebration of the Worlds of Joss Whedon by the Women Who Love Them
Featuring Elizabeth Bear, Teresa Jusino, Racheline Maltese, NancyKay Shapiro, and Priscilla Spencer.

Brooklyn Waystation
683 Washington Ave
Prospect Heights, Brooklyn
MONDAY, MARCH 14TH
7:00PM
Reading to be followed by signing

Why you want to come other than the pure awesome that is Whedonistas and the fact that we should have books on hand for you to buy before you can get it anywhere else (unless you were at Gally)? The bar’s bathroom is through the TARDIS. I mean, just think about it. Jack has totally shagged someone in the TARDIS bathroom, right? Live vicariously, people, live vicariously!

can we please get a barbershop for dykes around here?

I think it’s fair to say that most people who are, or have ever been perceived as, female at any point in their lives hate getting their hair cut. It’s expensive, time consuming, and never exactly the way you want it. There’s skin care advice you don’t want, fretting about the grey you actually like, and inane questions about the heteronormative life you may not possess. And they if do get your hair right for a half a second they go and blow dry it and screw it all up so that you have to wash it again the second you get home. Let’s take a moment to share our collective pain.

Okay. Moving on.

Now, if you’re a woman or otherwise perceived/misperceived as female and you like to wear your hair short, it’s a whole new bucket of fun. Yes, I really want it that short. No, I’m not edgy or daring. Yes, I’ve worn it this short before. Yes, I’m sure. No, my boyfriend doesn’t have an opinion, because I don’t have a boyfriend. And when I did, do you know what his opinion was? His opinion was, you should cut my hair the way I want it cut.

I’m very specific when I get my hair cut, and I give them as much info as I can: “It’s been two months since my last cut, I want a basic men’s hair cut, straight across the back, part on the left, everything brushed forward, bit of fringe in the front, if it’s long enough that it starts to curl take more off.”

And yet….

Today I had to assure my stylist I was a lesbian before she would stop advocating for me to “soften the look” and stop fretting about whether or not I was sure, as I sat there grinning viciously and thinking about the men who taught me how to be the type of beautiful I am.

What part of, “I wear custom suits, and I want this crap that ruins the line off the back of my neck” do you not understand? Oh, all of it. Right.

The haircut turned out fine. But seriously, I hate this process, which is why I get my haircut once every two or three months, as opposed to every three weeks like I should.

So let me put the word out: if you are a queer person who has ever thought about opening a salon for other queer people (bonus points if you’re a dyke, genderqueer or transmasculine and are thinking barbershop) in NYC, please do. I would happily pay a lot more and, in fact, spend a lot of time on the subway, even traveling to the far reaches of Brooklyn, to be among my own people, not get asked about the husband I don’t have, avoid the awkward when I bring reference photos of men who aren’t androgynous, and have someone cut my hair who understands that if I don’t feel a fucking razor on the back of my neck at some point in the process, they are doing it wrong.

it’s almost spring trash day

It’s almost, marginally, spring here. It’s nice. I’ve been pretty much stuck in the house though, dealing with various illnesses, desperately trying to finish various articles for various books, and adjusting to this home office thing, which has its pluses and minuses, and the wrinkles of which I really want to sort out before Patty comes home in about a month. Home. Patty. Good. She’s really awesome, you know.

Astounding actually. She just called me. She’s in Mumbai. She’s not supposed to be in Mumbai. She’s supposed to be in Baroda, having taken an overnight train from Delhi last night. Since the ticket indicated a boarding time and end time, 8:30am, she assumed that time was when she’d arrive in Baroda. Nope, train stopped at Baroda in the middle of the night and she woke up in Mumbai. But, friends from her dig have family there, she’s been well taken care of, and she’ll get on a train to Baroda tomorrow.

If it were me, I’d freak out. But she’s good.

Now, on to stuff….

First thanks for being so totally awesome and engaged with the big post about and the link to the mourning work yesterday. I spend a lot of time having certitude about this stuff and being shameless about this stuff, but it’s also deeply scary, vulnerable space for me, on intellectual and professional levels as well as personal ones.

Next, speaking of Bristol-related stuff, Ika Willis has a great post about the horror of hate speech delivered in a reasonable tone, and that thing where queer people are expected to do hard, unpleasant work that should be unnecessary, for free, to spice up someone else’s “conversation” about hate (now with correct URL, sorry about that). No thanks.

In the department of things that make me uncomfortable, things that also remind me of home (even if I was an interloper, even if I am 10 years older than everyone in this article, even if the name makes me shudder): New York’s newest list of 400 to be on, the Native Society. Mostly this reminds me that I need to decide whether I am going to the Hewitt reunion this year or not (although I certainly won’t make Patty suffer through it again; she can rescue me after).

I’ve decided that to go with my suits and other anachronistic habits, I want some letterpress business cards. Recommendations, anyone?

Today’s crowdfunding link is about bread. Really. Bread. I can’t eat bread, because I have celiac disease, but if I could eat bread, I would eat this bread, so folks — get some bread! (Seriously, once Patty is home I may order some for her).

Can we talk about Hugo Weaving as the Red Skull? Because that is some masterful design work (both makeup and costume). It’s also dark. Powerfully so, in that troublesome way where the bad guys always have the best outfits (see: Jack’s coat = awesome; John Hart’s coat = AWESOME). I’m fascinated, both in fact and fiction, about the marketing of evil, both as evil (as happens with villains in fiction) and as the supposedly right thing that’s actually horrific beyond previous imagining (which is generally the insidious way it goes down in non-fictional life). Fascinating stuff on the screen, even more fascinating, I suspect, when it comes to the reception it’s getting and is going to get (I had a long, enjoyable email thread with Christian yesterday about Bad Things That Will Happen in Fandom Regarding This Character and Why We Should Write a Torchwood Battles the Red Skull Fanfic immediately). Who are the bad guys that keep you awake at night, not because they are too terrifying (and they are), but because they are too fascinating for your comfort?

Finally, there’s this awesome search string that keeps sending people to this journal: “In what ways can we look at fiction as history?” I’m sure there’s some actual scholarship on it out there, but once I crawl out from under all these deadlines, I’m going to take a stab at my own take on it, because I adore the question so much.

On that note, I need to go finish some stuff so Kali and I can get back to our book, which is all about the uncomfortably human lives of some mostly awful (and evil) people, and Erica and I can get back to our musical, which is about some people that aren’t awful at all, but get vilified for the work they do and the concerns with which their lives and bodies provide them.

butch isn’t ugly

Butch Lab Symposium is a blog carnival/round-up where participants blog independently on a monthly theme related to butch identity, and then later post a list of other participants’ pieces.

This month’s question, “What do people think ‘butch’ means? What are the stereotypes around being butch? What do people assume is true about you [or the masculine of center folks in your life], but actually isn’t? What image or concept do you constantly have to correct or fight against? How do you feel about these misconceptions? How do you deal with them? Do you respond to these stereotypes or cliches? How?” seemed particularly on point for me.

In my essay in Whedonistas I talk a good deal about how hard I find it to identify with the women of Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel the Series. I don’t look, or feel, like them by default. Yes, sometimes I wear dresses and present femininely, and, when I do, I can be quite good at it. Sometimes it feels comfortable and sometimes it doesn’t.

My life as a boy, meanwhile, is very much the same way, and, and the end of the day, it’s hard for me to have a word for what I am because there are such rigid definitions, not just of male and female, but of butch and femme. Sure, I have the de rigueur short hair, but the fussy suits make people questions my masculinity cred in the queer community as surely as they make some people questions the masculinity of foppish men in the world of more mainstream gender roles (see: my off-hand remark about Wesley Wyndham-Price in my Whedonistas piece).

As far as I can tell, most people think butch means a whole lot of things that don’t really have very much to do with me. Of course, there’s the role of the butch/femme dynamic in the lesbian community past and present, and I’ll confess I have some affection for its cultural presence in my world, even if it’s largely worked against me and mine (I’m not just butch, my partner wouldn’t define as femme (again, check Whedonistas for more, but she keeps a pick-axe under our sink), and a whole lot of femmes I know that have dated each other are really sick of explaining to people, that yes, really, two femmes can be together!).

But more than that, there are just all these cultural expectations of masculinity that get bound up in butchness that make me really uncomfortable, not just because in a lot of ways I’ll never measure up, but because in a lot of ways, I don’t want to. Because gender is often defined through others (the “a man is a man because of how a man responds to a woman” theory of gender), butchness often seems to become about what it’s not, and as such, often seems to engender a great deal of rhetoric that is covertly, if not overly, misogynist.

Being butch doesn’t, or at least shouldn’t, mean I have to have certain interests (e.g., sports, which I largely don’t care for), skills (e.g., Patty changes lightbulbs and deals with tools because I am largely useless at these things), and social and sexual roles (my own being unnecessary to describe for the sake of this entry). And it certainly shouldn’t require me to be misogynist, which is something I see more and more gay women complaining about lately — butches that assert their butchness by denigrating femmes in all the same ways that women get denigrated by men in het culture.

But, if I reject the external assumptions of what a butch is, what’s left to define me as butch, at least on the days where I would consider myself such? The answer, is, simply, that I don’t know. This is striking, not, however, because of any need to self-define a role in the community of gay women, but because of what it says about gender on a wider scale. If there is nothing that is essential to butchness (although I’m sure a lot of us, probably even me, would say we know it when we see it), then there is, also arguably, nothing that is essential to masculinity.

And that’s when people in the heterosexual and heteronormative world, especially if they’re politicians it seems, start getting really scared. If masculinity or femininity — if butchness or femmeness — only exists in the eyes of others, how can you ever really be sure you are what you say you are? Is it too much to ask that people be that self-assured of their gender identity, whether it is consciously constructed or not? And is this challenge to the idea of gender certitude why the idea of gender as flexible and self-defined makes some people so angry? Or why trans and gender non-conforming people are so often in so much danger?

On this theme, I was struck particularly by Rachel Maddow’s segment last night on political truth. In passing in that segment (it’s towards the end, for those of you not wanting to watch the whole thing), she mentions the way that people try to insult her when these arguments about political truth come up — they say that she’s gay and that she looks like a man.

Now, I don’t know whether Maddow identifies as butch or not, but I do know that in her off-camera presentation she reads so much more masculinely to me than she does on camera (and effectively admits to same in the segment, although even more briefly). I imagine, based on my own experiences, that that’s a hard bargain to make every night. It’s a moment she doesn’t linger on in the piece, but it points the way to one clear thing: “looking like a man” is, apparently, for many people, one of the worst things a woman can do.

But for some women, that’s not an insult. Hell, it can be the best thing we’ve ever damn heard. Which gets me to the misconception about butchness — whether my butchness meets some butch standard or not — that aggravates me the most: butch isn’t ugly. It’s not a presentation that derives out of some failed femininity. It’s not this thing we do because we were bad at what we’re supposed to do. It’s just this thing we do.

On the list of preconceptions about butchness that come from both inside and outside the queer community, this one is, I recognize, seemingly trivial. But, using people’s self-definition as a slur is a nasty business, and defining butchness as ugliness is a special type of misogyny that is restrictive and vicious for all women, regardless of whether butchness is even anywhere on the map of their world.

the activism trap

Being an activist can really suck. Let me show you how.

I’m engaged with anti-bullying efforts for a bunch of reasons. This includes the fact that I was severely bullied as a kid, as a teen, during university, and periodically as an adult on the wonder that is the Internet; that I find working on anti-bullying initiatives healing; and that I believe my way with words and openness can help the cause.

But at core, the reason I want to stop bullying is so that people who are awesome have the space to do awesome stuff. It’s hard to make art, do research, be an awesome friend, teach kids, help animals, strive for political reform, provide awesome customer service or do whatever it is you do if you’re being bullied and recovering from being bullied. The best reason to support anti-bullying is so that more people have the space to be the most awesome versions of themselves they can be.

The thing is, when I spend all my time talking about stopping bullying or anti-gay harassment or sexism or transphobia or whatever thing I feel its critical to speak out about (and feel capable of speaking out about — there are lots of issues I support where it’s probably better for me to let other people speak while I keep learning), I don’t have time to do my awesome stuff. And then it’s a little bit like the bullies have won, because they’ve forced me to abandon my agenda and will for the purpose of responding to their actions and arguments.

This really sucks. And it’s emblematic of something I think most activists face at various times. From feminist advocacy to fighting poverty to stopping racism — when you have to be an activist all the time, it’s easy to lose the benefits you’re supposed to enjoy from that activism helping to make the world better. Balance is key, but, in a cruel world, pretty hard to come by.

Which is why I really want to stop talking about the Buffy thing (here, have a summary from someone who was there and isn’t me), because I feel that particular activism trap closing in around me. But, that said, there are a few remaining things I do want to address.

First, thank you for keeping it civil. While a few comments here have made me angry or upset, and while I disagree with some opinions I’ve seen expressed, no one really crossed the line in discourse here. That’s awesome, and I totally appreciate it.

Next, about that argument where you say, “Well, I want to take this person at her word, but she sounds awfully emotional, and therefore I can’t.” — That argument is a misogynistic rhetorical device that often gets pulled out against women who are upset and not against men who are angry. It’s happened in various branches of this discussion (which is now happening across Whedonesque, several blogs, and Livejournal). It’s an effective rhetorical device due to the way we treat women in this world, but it’s not actually good argumentation. It’s also angry-making. Please knock it off.

Additionally, I am really trying to avoid making a post about the whole “toughen up” thing and why it’s so problematic, as, again, I don’t want to get sucked into the negative self-impact activism trap I described in the opening of this post. However, it’s important to me that you understand the following things: First, there is no universal standard of appropriate emotional feeling; just as the Goblin King asks Sarah in Labyrinth what her basis of comparison is when she declares, “It’s not fair,” I would ask you what yours is when you say someone is over-sensitive. Second, it is my sensitivity that allows me to do what I do for a living — writing stories, examining pop-culture, performing, and eroding the artificial boundaries we’ve set up between scholarship and sentimentality. (A theoretical excess of) feeling, just like anything else, can be a tool, an advantage, and a weapon; it’s certainly one of mine. Trying to stamp it out or devalue it, isn’t just nasty, it’s illogical.

Finally, stop with the “free speech” and “censorship” noises. I’m a trained journalist. I give to the ACLU, and I am, like Rachel Maddow, an absolutist about free speech in the legal sense. Wanting to have as little government regulation of speech as possible is not, however, inconsistent with wanting people not to be egregious to each other; encouraging people to be civil in public; telling people to knock it off when I’m offended; and using the tools I have available to me to manage speech in the online venues that I host. Arguments to the contrary are disingenuous, and beyond this statement, I will not engage them.

What would I love to see going forward? I’d love to see more discussion, in general. Just hearing all these viewpoints (which are not split into two camps, but run a wide gamut) is, I think, valuable to everyone. I’d also like to see, as Chip from Two-minute Time Lord and I discussed late one night at this year’s Gally, con panels that have historically been about fans behaving badly branch out into discussions of how we can make things better.

I would also like to see discussion from activists of all stripes talk on how we can work hard, avoid burnout, and reap the benefits of the change we are trying to create in the world while continuing to be activists. It’s hard stuff, and we’re all still learning.

Now I’m going back to explaining why Sarah Jane Smith’s status as a journalist proves that the Doctor is real.

HPA guest blog up

While I’m at JFK enjoying airport time (and if any can tell my why my Mac randomly jumped to LA time while I’m sitting in the Soho Bistro in terminal 8 in NYC, let me know), my guest blog has gone live over at The Harry Potter Alliance. While you read, I’m going to sit here enjoying my celiac-friendly burger without a bun while having massive nostalgia as this place blasts Natalie Imbruglia’s “Torn.” Now that was a different life.

Harry Potter Alliance Livestream

So that? Was totally awesome! And not just because I got to procrastinate packing my luggage for Gallifrey One.

If you were there and want to say hi (or ask questions or whatever), please feel free! There’s some other content here about bullying and LGBTQ issues, as well as stuff about politics and my random life writing and talking about media and pop-culture. Also, since you might be curious: this is me as a man and this is me as a woman.

My first guest blog on the HPA website should be up soon, and there will be a second one, but I’m not writing that until I get back from Los Angeles.

Meanwhile, are you fannish? Are you for equality? Do you use Facebook? Then check out Fans for Equality.

If you missed the Livestream, I believe there will be a recorded version of it up later. More when I know it! Thanks to Andrew and Arletta and everyone at HPA for making it happen.

Okay, now I really have to pick out some shirts and ties for this trip. Later all!

leaving on a jet plane

Since I’m getting on a plane for Los Angeles tomorrow and have way too many things to do, not just between now and then, but between now and the end of the month, I thought I’d get a little bit of administrativa out of the way while it’s in my head.

First, please don’t forget about tonight’s Livestream from The Harry Potter Alliance on stopping teen bullying, preventing teen suicide and raising awareness about various gender identity topics as relates to learning how to make things better for LGBTQ kids.

Next, it’s Gallifrey One!

Let’s start with the official stuff: Please come check out the Whedonistas launch on Saturday at 3pm, followed by an autograph session at 4:30pm.

On the unofficial front: I’m basically not cosplaying this year (the exception being briefly for a friend’s Inception photo shoot; if you should see me dressed like Arthur, please don’t mistake me for Ianto, because I don’t know what my response will be, but I suspect neither of us will enjoy it). There are myriad reasons for this, mostly odd, personal and complicated. I don’t ultimately know if it’s going to be a decision I’m happy with, but it is what it is.

Next, my recall of names and faces is poor. While I can think of a good couple of dozen people I will recall by name and face at the con, I can’t promise it will be you. Please don’t take this personally, please do remind me of who you are. I hate that I’m like this, but it seems to be a somewhat immutable fact.

I should also tell you that I am deep into writing two academic articles that are due at the end of this month. I may well be writing them in the lobby at the Marriott, because background noise is good for my soul. Stopping by and saying hi is fine (and good and awesome), but if I stick my head back into my computer, this is why.

If you see me Wednesday night when I get to the hotel, I will only have two priorities: putting my crap down and getting to In-and-Out Burger before it closes. Wait ’til I have burgers until you say more than hello. I am not even kidding.

If we haven’t met before, I look forward to meeting you.

Almost finally, on the subject of an entirely different con, after much hemming and hawing, Patty and I have decided that we’re taking a year off from Dragon*Con so that I can take her to San Francisco, something that’s been on our to do list since we first met. I just got the vacation time approved today, so now seemed like the time to share. I haven’t been in about four years, and it’s a place I really do adore visiting (although I’ve never particularly felt like I could live there). I know we know a lot of people out there and so we’ll make a plan for group socializing for one night when it gets closer, but I think otherwise we’re not going to do the running around and seeing people from the Internet thing, because if we were, we’d just go to Dragon*Con.

And last, but not least, because it’s always fun to end a post on a note about the end of the world, here, have an article about New York’s legal guide for handling the apocalypse.

talking about bullying and gender identity

The Harry Potter Alliance is an organization that uses parallels from the Harry Potter books to educate and mobilize young people across the world toward issues of literacy, equality, and human rights. Their goal is to make civic engagement exciting by channeling the entertainment-saturated facets of our culture toward mobilization for deep and lasting social change.

A lot of the issues the HPA is engaged in are near and dear to my heart. These include fighting bullying and advocating for the rights of LGBTQ people.

Recently, after a discussion that involved gender identity concerns on a Harry Potter mailing list went a bit awry, the HPA and I wound up in contact about issues of bullying and how they impact people who are gender non-conforming.

As part of their current campaign to stop bullying against LGBTQ kids and to highlight how that bullying can lead to the acceptance of human rights abuses like those against queer people in Uganda, I’ll be participating both in their blog (with one piece going live soon, and another after I get back from Los Angeles) and in a Livestream event they’ll be holding tomorrow night, February 15 at 8:30pm. You can participate by visiting the Livestream channel at http://www.livestream.com/imaginebetter. The agenda items include youth bullying, depression, suicide and awareness of transgender issues.

I may be a Slytherin, but that doesn’t mean I’m on Voldemort’s side. For me, it’s about being ruthless and ambitious, and, having seen the dark, choosing the light.

Please take a chance to check out the HPA, and I hope you’ll join us on the Livestream. I’ll update this post with links to my blog entries there as they are posted.

Thank you!

I never wanted to be honey

I used to be a fencer. I hate to say that in the past tense, but despite my whole “all times are now” thing, it seems dishonest to say otherwise.

I used to be a fencer, and I was very serious about it. This wasn’t sport fencing, that thing in the Olympics that’s like tag, but fencing as part of the family of Western Martial Arts, in which we trained as if preparing for an actual engagement.

It appealed to me because of the way physicality informs my understanding of history, and because it seemed like a worthy and necessary addition to the list of gentlemanly arts I have pursued (which include horseback riding, social dance and, weirdly, walking (oh, Regency era!)).

But the question isn’t really why I fenced or what it meant to me, but why I left, and why I am telling you this now.

I left because the standards — social, technical, and ethical — were inconsistent.

Some people were praised for treating our pursuits with a sense of military discipline, while others were mocked. Some were allowed to be clowns on the floor because it was amusing to our instructors, when others would be snapped at for so much as speaking out of turn.

We were told we were modern people in the modern world enrolled in physical coursework. Yet we were also told we were essentially a mystery school and were never to speak of the salle on the Internet. We were told our school was the best in the world, while others were mocked; if the first were true (and it was), why was the second necessary?

And, and this is the really important part, for an activity that relies not on strength or size but on geometries and allows men and women to compete against each other as equals, gender and queerness were constant “problems” in my salle.

It was little things: like the oft said “Every fencer needs a good fencing wife.” Obnoxious not just to me and any queer person in the salle, but obnoxious to the multiple couples who fenced together with equal seriousness and skill. Or the grief one guy was constantly given about the way he kept his hair out of his eyes (with a barrette, deemed too feminine). And let’s not forget the way our fencing master would mock, with limp wrists, the male ballet dancers who had joined and then quit (maybe it wasn’t that they couldn’t hack it, maybe it was that they felt unwelcome). Or the way that, that master would always tell me how he’d get yelled at in his own ballet classes as a young man for chasing after the girls.

The problem with my fencing experience wasn’t that I was female. It’s that I was in an environment where it wasn’t supposed to matter that I was in order to pursue knowledge about the man I could never have been (I would have not been born to a class that had the right to swords) but wanted to know of, given the opportunity, and yet I had my perceived gender enforced on me at all times.

“Don’t be embarrassed, you should aim for the nipple,” an instructor once said. Who told you I was embarrassed? It was the first time I had hit someone. All I did was miss because it was a new skill. There are many things I am afraid of, but the flesh has never been one.

“Don’t be afraid,” I was told. And who said I was afraid? as I was learning to place my point.

There were other gay women in the class. Very well-liked by our master, who also quite liked me too. But they were of a different generation, and I don’t believe had the gender issues that I do. They were not wounded by an insistence they were something they were not there to be, and they did not struggle with finding the right tone to fit in.

I took up fencing before I met Patty, in what I call my Black Year. I was excruciatingly miserable, and the salle really saved me because no matter how bad I felt — whether it was depression or menstrual cramps or the effects of celiac disease or the damn flu — I went. Even when I looked like I was going to fall over and people told me I should be home resting. I went, because it was order and ambition and something I could subsume my will into. I went because it was a way to learn never to hesitate; I would be a fighter, yes, but it would also make me a better horseback rider and a better pilot and a better leader. I would give up my life to this thing; I would explain how Martha Graham said takes 30 years to be a dancer.

And, even when the homophobia and heteronormativity was driving me up the wall, I was writing essays trying to convince myself that the choice I was making was acceptable because the skills I was being offered were available to me no where else within reach or with that level of expertise — we are all, after all, fallible, and a rare skill and a willingness to teach it is worth the thorns.

But yet, eventually, one day, I just didn’t go to fencing. I was sick or tired or busy and not in the mood to see boys with only six weeks of training being allowed to use the saber because they were members of a small and obscure young men’s Catholic organization my master was friends with the founder of, while I was told, after well more than a year, that I was lucky to train in saber at all, occasionally, because women once weren’t allowed.

I had never felt like a woman in that room, and it was terrible to be told I was, when on the days I could not bring my own confidence and force to the morass of difficulty that was the salle, I pretended to be men from fiction, and then, suddenly, could disarm my partners over and over and over again.

I wasn’t a great fencer, and I wasn’t a terrible one. I was a hard worker and brutally determined; and I wanted, more than anything, to keep this art from passing out of the world. I was gifted in some ways, and relentlessly weak in others. I struggled against my celiac disease, my left-handedness, and my shyness. But I smiled when I fenced, grinning behind my mask, not in glee, but because I could feel myself in the midst of so many simultaneous and ruthless narratives; there are men I recall laughing with as we fenced, and I will never forget them or my gratitude. And I loved nothing more than to do our salutes crisply (and I loathed those who did not) or the narrative of the grand salute, which is complex and includes the dialogue, “To you the honor” and the response, “I obey.”

A popular topic in the salle was about why we started fencing. I, perhaps, made a mistake on the very first day when I did not say “because I am interested in the gentlemanly arts of the Regency era” and said instead that it was (and this was also true) because of a book, Ellen Kushner’s Swordspoint (centered, I should note, on a swordsman and his boyfriend; and also the book through which Patty and I met, when I still fenced, and which continues even today as a narrative in our lives). But I did not name the book. Did not explain my own queerness. Was just instead a shy, mumbly girl nerd, who learned eventually what reasons were actually acceptable: A Game of Thrones, always okay. A background in the SCA? Only if you disavowed their fighting styles and hobbyism.

The degree to which we were all nerds, but engaged in a nasty hierarchy of acceptable nerd-ness was significant, and I felt like I had to do a lot to hide things like fannishness and my Harry Potter book and my various historical reenactment interests — not because these things were never okay, but because they were only okay in the salle from some people in some ways.

All of which brings me to why I am writing this: In the black year of my life, I found a thing to apprentice myself to, but not people. I was left, again, to be not only my own master, but my own advocate, a good, valuable, brutal lesson as it always has been, but one I received in an unfortunate year in an unfortunate place where I had allowed myself to be made mute.

I think, often, of telling these stories in far more extreme detail and with the naming of names. I think, too, of swallowing my pride and going back, of convincing myself it was ego that made me fail and not an environment that was a poor and impossible fit for my form (ironic, perhaps, considering fencing history like La Maupin). I think, finally, that I am loud and big and brave and strong enough to go back and speak, to challenge the master when he says things which I simply cannot bear, even as my love of formality and order cringes at the very thought.

Recently, I received an event notice for a conference run, not by the salle, but by a group of people, some affiliated with the salle, some not, designed to promote Western Martial Arts. It will include demos and instruction in various Western Martial Arts as well as panels and other activities relating to things like SF/F, pirates and steampunk. At present, the opening page of the website features men with swords, geek related things and women with a great deal of cleavage (one with a barely noticeable sword, one covered in blood, one sprawled languidly), while, meanwhile, not a single guest is female.

I realize they’re still booking people. I realize this may, and probably will, change. I realize that women I know will attend. And, of course, I recall that the other master in what was my salle is a woman, small and deadly. But the whole thing reminded me that even if I could be the woman they expected me to be who would then receive equality based on skill on the fencing floor — I wouldn’t. Not really.

Because when you mock male ballet dancers as limp-wristed, when you criticize a man on how he wears his hair; when you insist on telling women their technical problems as fencers are about fear or embarrassment or the immutable shape of their hipbones; when you talk about “good fencing wives” and invite virulently homophobic religious activists into our midst, you’re not just being homophobic, you’re saying it’s bad to be feminine; you’re saying women (who must be of a precisely single sort) can, theoretically, be equal to men (who must be of another precisely single sort), but yet never actually will be.

I never wanted to be honey; I just wanted to fight. I have so much gratitude and love for the people that taught me how, which is why, I suppose, in the year of my broken heart, I let them break it even more.